Both of our main texts this week: the film “Beautiful Country” and the book by Aimee Phan, “We should Never Meet” had an interesting similarity in that they favor story lines and plots that don’t “resolve.”
That may be a bit strong. Perhaps they don’t resolve in the “Western way” that we’re used to. In class, Kris touched a bit on the idea that in Western culture we tend to be very interested in how things end: the guy gets the girl, the bad guy is beaten, the happy ending closes with a symbolic sunset, etc. but is that entirely realistic? If we look at the idea of a continuum, where a given story or plot is just a singular point in the life of a character who exists before the plot and will continue to exist after the plot, then it seems impossible for things to ever tie together that smoothly.
For example some of the most popular movies in Western culture right now are superhero movies. Occasionally characters will leave a snippet of conflict unresolved (at least until the next movie) or a character might allude back to the past in order to provide exposition, but generally speaking these films are short, flashy, funny, and always end with at least one bad guy being utterly defeated. I LOVE superhero movies but after some of the reading we’ve been doing this quarter I am starting to wonder if I can also fall in love with the more realistic style of storytelling that I’ve been experiencing.
Life’s events are rarely tied up with a neat little bow and to leave things hanging or in limbo, while sometimes less satisfying, paints a more complex picture of the story and characters. A lot of the stories this quarter have been really sad and have ended in uncertainty leaving the reader to wonder about the future, but I believe they have left their mark and made a greater impact on me for it.



