To upload a bunch of images (or other files) at once, go into the folder, select Tools > Zip Archive. etc. etc. Works quite nicely!
Inside CSS, can have Cascade manage locations of referenced images: url(‘[system-asset]/_files/images/bg01.jpg[/system-asset]’) and so on. (But in “Edit > System” must check “Rewrite links in file”)
I really wish there was a tooltip next to “system name” when uploading a file that actually SAID that it’ll take the file’s name if you don’t fill it in.
Thinking that the switch to Sites should NOT be done automatically, at least not for the main site. So many things we could be doing so much better.
Is there any way to make the text editor window automatically just a bit bigger w/out going fullscreen?
So in Sites (vs Global) a Content Type is required?
I would really like it if the Data Definition builder forced the no spaces in identifiers. Because seriously that’s the third time I’ve created a data definition with a space in a field ID, and I don’t realize it’s broken until I go to actually create some content & get a damn error.
I really wish this was three (?) half-days that started at a reasonable (PDT) hour and ended at a reasonable (EDT) hour. Getting up at 5:15 is catching up with me.
Really thinking about how to generate a dynamic side navigation rather than having people edit XHTML blocks for navigation.
Still don’t quite get when you’d want to set blocks in the template vs configuration set. Template: that block will ALWAYS be in the same spot in the template. Config set: you might want to change what goes in the various system-regions of the template.
Configuration set can include multiple outputs for individual pages. (That PDF etc that Susan was on about.) And on a page that’s a listing of things, that could theoretically include an RSS feed of those things. No need for two separate files.
When do you use Velocity vs XSLT?
Day 2
Dynamic Fields in the metadata sets – why these vs data definition fields? He explained how they’re different, but not why.
Metadata fields, Visibility “inline” = on the actual content creation page.
We’re not using the “link” content type often enough, as far as I can tell. (My.e.e probly being the prime example.)
Most of today’s stuff was either a repeat of yesterday or things I’d already worked out. I would like to take a look at the other kind of index block, though. And I’m definitely thinking about how to create a non-manual navigation.
Workflow still doesn’t make any sense.
Something I tweeted today: What [redacted] does well, from I can tell: speedy for visitors, easy to see what content is in your site, fine-grained access control.
A related tweet from @eaton: Drupal = rich content modeling, WordPress = great OOB workflow for river of news, Rails = better for pure RESTful apps/APIs?
And the rich content modeling is what I’m trying to get out of Cascade. I would push for Drupal instead, but I don’t know how to get it to do the things that Cascade does really well, which I think are all really important.
Hm.