Berlin Wall Memorial

Historical materialism wishes to retain that image of the past which unexpectedly appears to man singled out by history at a moment of danger. The danger affects both the content of the tradition and its receivers. The same threat hangs over both: that of becoming a tool of the ruling classes. (Walter Benjamin, Theses on the Philosophy of History: VI)

Is this propaganda or memorialization? This is the question I have been unable to answer after my visit to the Berlin Wall Memorial. Is it both? If so, how? Is it possible to have a memorial that doesn’t propagandize itself? Sure, the capitalist west “won,” but should that be the only narrative? What happens to our sense of self and government when we stop our public historical probing at the horror of the 136 dead and the totalitarian control of life in the DDR. How often is “respecting the dead” used as an obfuscation? What else is there? Where is this history?

I found another small horror in viewing the “death strip” as a purely aesthetic object, one possessing a minimalism that captures the Kantian sublime like no other I’ve encountered, the smooth gravel almost looking like a canvas Agnes Martin could pencil lines on.

Posted in Berlin, Class Trips | Leave a comment

KulturBingo: Berlinische Galerie

I’ve been thinking about the museum as a site for possible (cross)cultural didacticism: a reinscription of the spectaclized social order that still manages to drive itself beyond the seemingly clear hegemonic strictures it reproduces and codifies—a tenderly productive idea thoughtfully presented in the first essay we read for this course: “Escape From Amnesia: The Museum as Mass Medium,” by Andreas Huyssen. This “driving beyond,” (not his words) as Huyssen presents it, has the possibility of being performed by curator, artist and spectator. Given this, I found a case par excellence upon viewing Erwin Wurm’s work “One Minute Sculptures” as displayed in the Berlinische Galerie. The work asks the viewer for direct involvement with the objects presented: one has to put their own body directly into the situation of the work by making a prescribed “sculpture” with the books, chairs, refrigerators, and other common objects. I was immediately pleased with my own embarrassment and hesitancy to place my self within the “performance” of the works having gone to the gallery by myself. So, instead, I relegated my viewing to look at others who were sharing their interactions with the art through looking at each other and taking photographs of themselves doing as such: people sharing the wearing of a large sweater, placing their legs awkwardly through a chair, laying on an arrangement of tennis balls, sticking their heads into both sides of a small doghouse, standing within a folded lawn chair, and so forth.

This sense of being forced, or rather, permitted, to directly negotiate the bodily is continued in Wurm’s “Narrow House,” a “faithful reconstruction of his parents’ home in every detail, except that the artist has compressed it into a depth of just over a meter” (from the gallery’s web site). While the copy explaining the house lettered on the wall in the museum refers to this narrowing as symbolizing the strictures of provincial life, the main difficulty in viewing the work is found within the difficult negotiation between everybody trying to view the work. How can we all move through the space to allow for a full glimpse? (I can’t imagine what it’ll be like during high tourist season.) Hence the happy, if subtly disquieting embarrassment I found in these works: as embodied viewers, we must constantly question how we are engaging with the material at hand. We are not just bodies to be pleased. It was a wonderful reminder to take account of what it is to look at things and engage with them as others, without and within.

Posted in KulturBingo | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Visit to the Jüdishes Museum

Well, I was successfully nauseated by the architecture of the hallways underneath the building. The forced perspective of the sloped floor and uneven angles of the hallways left me feeling properly destabilized (this architecture is very intentional) before we were led on what what as a half-lame tour of only a very small part of the Museum. The guide was anxious to the point of distraction and only showed us a couple of exhibits: I was thus a little disappointed. (Will I ever not be vaguely disappointed by these things?) The museum, however, was full of carful didacticism, offering a tour of the history of Jews in Germany. After lunch in the café, we didn’t have much time to continue walking through, so, I might return to take the full walk the galleries present.

Posted in Class Trips | Leave a comment

Psychic City No. 1, a Reflection On A Paul Klee

In many ways, I was lucky to find this small work by Paul Klee among the vast numbers of Picasso’s in the Berggruen Museum, a private art collection rendered available to the public via the cleanly whites and baroque architecture of the historically sited state funded gallery, a space very different from Sammlung Boros’s rough concrete walls and floors, retained as found so as to produce the immanent “authentic” of the hip and moneyed. I say lucky, because the figure of the drawing, “Wissen         Schweigen        Vorübergehen,” the title spread along the bottom of the drawing as if it were a Mallarmé, seems to be one who is viewing or at least cognizant of Benjamin’s “angel of history,” an angel drawn from Klee’s “Angels Novus,” as our class is no doubt familiar. While that figure is surrounded with golden hue, this person, or image of a person, is placed within the brown and grey mist of hazy decay, the dust of the old: books, scrolls, ruins, swampy and polluted waters.

The figure, genderless or of mixed gender, is torqued at the hips, turning to face the viewer, arms held to the temple and chest in a dancerly gesture of shock and surprise, as if the title of the painting had suddenly approached from behind. Yet, because of the position of the eyes—one which looks directly at the viewer, the other slightly skewed to an indeterminate point behind whom ever is looking at the work—an observer of the drawing is inclined to make the same gesture, to turn one’s body in the same manner as the body of the drawing, to look behind at something unknown, something startling and untoward in its challenge to subjective stability. This sense, of course, was only discovered after a long gaze. If it is indeed that “Wissen” and “Schweigen” have crossed behind you, a viewer of the work is interrogated as one possessing the same challenged access to the title of the work, access only granted by looking somewhere else. The surprise of the new is spread out into an indeterminacy of unknown origin, a constant behind, something that shocks and swiftly escapes, leaving one destabilized and unsure, an affect further reflected in the complicated rendering of the legs: it could be two that are spread out in stability, or two sets in different times, one standing upright, the other on the edge of falling: Motion and in stasis are held in tension.

Besides the obvious reasons for this being a work of “degenerate art,” this clear statement of modern and complicated self reflexivity speaks to a questioning that fascism, at least in the manner it emerged in Nazi Germany, could not tolerate or reabsorb into its sense of self. The separation between the subject and the work is directly interrogated through the shock of the figured observer’s surprise, a surprise cast upon the viewer’s consciousness of their own possible bodily reaction.

Here’s a link to a web based image of the work:

http://www.kunstkopie.de/a/paul_klee/wissenschweigenvorueberge.html

Posted in Psychic City | Leave a comment

A Short Note: Sammlung Boros

I had never before been on a guided tour of a gallery before. I like to linger in front of art—going on a tour as swift as this one was frustrating as there wasn’t opportunity for the lengthy gaze authentic aesthetic experience requires. While is was interesting to get swift glimpses at what is a very interesting collection of objects and hear the quick, often well determined hermeneutic offered buy the guide (who I swear was a touch stoned), the tour presented itself as an hour and a half long commercial for patronage and interest, further propagating casual, surface level investigations that promote the general disregard of depth found in our spectaclized, entertainment and commodity obsessed culture. The works are indeed shared by the owners, so, they can at least be seen. Yet this is performed in a way that ends up hiding them from the guests that pay to be rushed from gallery to gallery, from work to work. It was titillation, and not much more. The situation of this presentation further reveals how distant our culture is from being able to recognize the other: this alone makes Sammlung Boros worth going to.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment