My Final Paper!

For my culminating paper, I wrote this paper entitled Cable Access to Community Media: Examining the Changing State of Public Access Media.

This research paper studies how public access television has been impacted by the rise of internet technology, and how it’s place in society is contested. While I heard numerous anecdotal examples through my internship about how these changes have impacted Thurston Community Media, I decided to focus this paper on Public Access as a whole, searching for nationwide trends.

I began by analyzing the foundations of public access in the early ’70s. I looked at who advocated for it and for what reasons. Then I examined what functions and services are offered by public access centers. By comparing the foundational reasoning and services with the possibilities offered online I try to answer the philosophical question of how access’s role in society has changed or been contested.

Next, I studied the material impact of changing technology, looking for station closures, budget cuts, and changes in participation and viewership. I explored the various justifications provided by municiple and state government for sacrificing this public service.

Finally, I turned back to local level and examined how particular access stations are adapting to changing technology. I approached this change through the shift from a “public access cable television station” to a “community media center.” I examined how exactly stations are being “community media centers,” what obstacles are holding others back, and what risks come with the refusal or inability to adapt.

I hope you learn a thing a two, I know I sure did. There’s very little scholarship on community media, and this is the beginning of my contribution to that limited body of work.

Check out the paper here: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1fBqEt-hx1XMj34YzYo8KV9dbQqDbAGAdHZn8vFXXdzY/edit?usp=sharing

Final 2 weeks at Thurston Community Media!

During my last 2 weeks at Thurston Community Media, I got to work on a few big projects and build on my skills acquired throughout the quarter.

I started week 9 by working on the Downtown for Holidays Parade shoot. We shot as a mobile studio crew with a mini control room and 3 cameras based in a room in the Governor’s Hotel which had roof access so we could get a good view for the shoot. I operated camera during the shoot, taking directions by headset and getting snapshots of happy faces in the crowd between floats. I also worked on the whole set up process.

For the rest of the week, I spent more time working with Final Cut Pro X while creating a station ID from previously recorded footage, worked at the 2 usual government meetings, attended a staff meeting, and had a meeting with Robert and Susan to talk about my evaluation.

In week 10 I began by working on a special Thurston County Budget public hearing. It was my first time working on a county meeting with just one other person, normally there are three of us. This meant that I had to run the CG station and audio at the same time, a challenge, but one I could handle. I came in the next day to work the 2 regular government meetings (Thurston County Council and Oly City Council). At Oly, it was just Martha and Myself so I worked as the robotic camera operator and sound operator at the same time. Finally, for my last day I came in and put together a short station promo from behind-the-scenes footage we had lying around and had a final meeting with Susan and Robert. They got a cake for me! I’m excited and honored to intern there again next quarter.

Alternative Views

I watched 2 episodes of the series Alternative Views, produced for Austin Community Television. The first was episode 30, “Marx and ‘socialism’ today, the promise betrayed?” Followed by episode 351. “Labor Struggles, Inside Views from the Bottom.” They were produced 10 years apart. Episode 30 is a talk show where the hosts interview a scholar from Yugoslavia who teaches at the University of Texas. They discuss how socialism works in the Eastern Block and how it differs in Yugoslavia, and how that version of socialism strays from the original liberatory ideas behind the movement. The next episode is more of a documentary, consisting of footage assembled from various labor groups around the country (such as interviews, picket lines, and people at work) to create a picture of the problems and success experienced by the labor movement at that time.

This series is often heralded as a success story of public access (see Hand-Held Visions, and Public Radio and Television in America). It is produced by volunteer community members for Austin’s cable access channel, but managed to gain popularity, and was played on access channels across the country. Episode 30 is made with extremely basic production techniques. A simple talk show, shot with only 2 cameras, cut together very awkwardly. It feels choppy, and the cameras are constantly zooming in and out. Episode 351, however, reveals a significant improvement in formal technique. While most of the footage was not shot by the Alternative Views crew, it shows how their popularity among the activist community allowed them to collaborate with producers in far flung regions to produce a compelling television documentary. Additionally the roll-in/theme song got a lot better.

Morrow Frank & Doug Kellner. Alternative Views. Austin Community Television, 1979 & 1988. Online, Archive.org.

 

Healthcare: Your Money or Your Life

I screened the observational-expository documentary, Healthcare: Your Money or Your Life produced by Downtown Community Television, Manhattan’s public access network. It exposes the reality of healthcare (in 1977) by showing the disparity between two hospitals in Brooklyn directly across the street from each other. One is the public hospital, overcrowded and understaffed, the nurses take out the trash and create makeshift linen bags. A man literally dies on screen because his life support machine malfunctions. The narrator explains that repairs are too expensive to make on the limited budget. Most of the patients are people of color. Across the street “there are no wait times”, they are renovating to provide brand new procedures, there’s tons of space, and most of the patients are white. Additionally the filmmakers spent some time at a health insurance office and a mental health care facility. This program shows the power of portable cameras when put to use for community television for social justice. Unlike much of public access, this program was probably funded by a pretty hefty grant, considering the producers spent “6 months” at the two hospitals.

Alpert, John & Keiko Tsuno. Healthcare: Your Money or Your life. Downtown Community Television, 1977. DVD.

Gulf Crisis TV Project, part 4

I screened part 4 of the Gulf Crisis TV Project, a 10 part series created by Paper Tiger TV and Deep Dish TV. It was produced in collaboration, and with support from, the network of activists across the country resisting war in the Middle East. As a participatory project, it took submissions from people with camcorders all across the country. As a result the video included footage from protests and interviews across the country, helping to show the scale of the resistance. The series was shown on public access channels across the country, several PBS stations, and screened by activist groups across the country.

This episode had a focus on resistance around the country, especially on teaching active duty soldiers how to resist. The show kept going back to the idea of being a conscientious objector, flashing a phone number at the bottom of the screen for soldiers to call and learn about the legality of getting that status. The program featured interviews with a number of soldiers, and followed some of them as they gave speeches at rallies or marched in protests. The form of the piece was essentially a participatory, or observational documentary. While the camera work wasn’t perfect, everything was understandable and nothing was lost due to lower production value. In fact, the sheer magnitude of protests and the very diverse array of people and places featured created a sense of power for the resistance. As a very fast moving piece, the doc was quickly cutting from one protest to another, to an interview with a soldier, to a fiery sermon in a church, and all over the place. I wish I had time to watch the rest of the series.

 

Deep Dish TV and Paper Tiger TV. “Part 4: Bring the Troops Home.” Gulf Crisis TV Project. 1991. Online, Mediaburn.org.